September 3, 2004
Venezuela:
computer study of recall vote
(The
New York Times) - "Two leading
American computer science researchers,
after studying results of the Aug. 15
recall referendum that President Hugo
Chávez won handily, did not detect
any statistical irregularities that would
indicate fraud, as antigovernment groups
contend. The researchers, Edward Felten
of Princeton University and Aviel D. Rubin
of Johns Hopkins, using election results
provided by Súmate, a group that
helped lead the recall, did note that
tampering with electronic machines would
not create the statistical anomalies they
were searching for.
But they said the fraud alleged was not
the type they would expect a cheating
government to employ. The Organization
of American States and the Atlanta-based
Carter Center, monitors of the election,
have emphatically said that their audits
showed no discrepancies or machine manipulation.
"